Click on the buttons in lower-left to see some creations of mine . You can also test yourself by typing a bracketted list of polar coordinates, cone angle, and color, then press the button in lower-right.
tiens mais je connais ce Flasheur ! ben sur ta démo on voit bien aussi la différence de performance sur Mac, enfin bon ça nous oblige à mieux optimiser nos projets... :)
Two observations I made (some years ago, so it may change with IE7 or FP10) about performance: - ActiveX removes at least 20% of your framerate, without apparent reason. - Strangely, it doesn't happen in Internet Explorer.
hey, it seems that Firefox 3 (that I just installed 1 hour ago) has no "framerate tax". The framerate is exactly the same as in standalone version !! Vive Firefox! Vive Mozilla ! :D
I said "- Strangely, it doesn't happen in Internet Explorer." ... but it seems that IE6 AND IE7 still cause a -50% loss of framerate (it may be -30% for lower framerates like 30 fps). When I researched the subject (in 2004), IE(5) was doing better than activeX-based wrappers (Zinc, Swfkit,..). Only Jugglor could preserve the orginal framerate by using exe projectors instead of activeX.
.
autour de 60-70 fps dans FireFox et 100-125 fps en standalone. C'est fou u_u.
ReplyDeletetiens mais je connais ce Flasheur !
ReplyDeleteben sur ta démo on voit bien aussi la différence de performance sur Mac, enfin bon ça nous oblige à mieux optimiser nos projets... :)
Two observations I made (some years ago, so it may change with IE7 or FP10) about performance:
ReplyDelete- ActiveX removes at least 20% of your framerate, without apparent reason.
- Strangely, it doesn't happen in Internet Explorer.
I didn't find any explanation of this.
hey, it seems that Firefox 3 (that I just installed 1 hour ago) has no "framerate tax". The framerate is exactly the same as in standalone version !!
ReplyDeleteVive Firefox! Vive Mozilla ! :D
I said "- Strangely, it doesn't happen in Internet Explorer."
ReplyDelete... but it seems that IE6 AND IE7 still cause a -50% loss of framerate (it may be -30% for lower framerates like 30 fps).
When I researched the subject (in 2004), IE(5) was doing better than activeX-based wrappers (Zinc, Swfkit,..). Only Jugglor could preserve the orginal framerate by using exe projectors instead of activeX.
now, try with Google Chrome :p
ReplyDeleteHey, I want source of this =)
ReplyDeleteAppreciate yourr blog post
ReplyDelete